|
Post by gogonutz on Jul 18, 2007 14:18:29 GMT -5
they skipped the 2nd half of Beast of Burden in their cover. But this is by far their best cover song. Jason makes it almost sound romantic, lol.. it's funny in a way
|
|
|
Post by hyperstarre on Jul 18, 2007 16:34:58 GMT -5
oh yes. that was awesome! especially beast of burden. gotta agree that that is their best cover.
|
|
|
Post by Minka on Jul 18, 2007 17:39:55 GMT -5
Jason makes it almost sound romantic, lol.. it's funny in a way He does. When I read the lyrics I was just a tiny bit shoked, but Jason takes the dirtiness out of this song Tho a dirty LH song owuld be cool too ;D
|
|
|
Post by thechosenone00 on Jul 18, 2007 18:04:02 GMT -5
I was also stunned at how Jason managed to make it a soft romantic, almost pained song. I now want to hear what he would do to that George Michaels song. That would be a hard one (pun intended)
|
|
|
Post by sunlitshores84 on Jul 18, 2007 18:09:50 GMT -5
YAY! This is beautiful! I visit this site all of the time!
|
|
|
Post by susan1218 on Jul 18, 2007 18:27:35 GMT -5
Thank you for posting this. I can't wait to watch it!
|
|
|
Post by jolene102 on Jul 18, 2007 18:43:39 GMT -5
i have yet to listen to this. i will hopefully be able to make time this friday.
|
|
|
Post by katelyn on Jul 18, 2007 18:53:23 GMT -5
I can't stop watching Beast of Burden. I was really shocked/curious when I first read the lyrics but the way they slowed it down really makes it sound like an entirely different song. I really like Bryce's backups, he and Jason sound so good together. My favorite part of the song is Jason's voice, it just sounds so raw and real and amazing. Definitely my favorite cover they've done.
|
|
|
Post by hyperstarre on Jul 18, 2007 18:59:01 GMT -5
i looked up the original and heard a clip of it last night....totally different. you're right, jason does sound raw and amazing and it does sound a bit "romantic." definitely awesome.
|
|
|
Post by gogonutz on Jul 18, 2007 19:07:04 GMT -5
I don't think it's that different. Just the vocals are different, but that's just because Jason is a whole different kind of vocalist. But I think they actually stayed quite true to the sound of the original, but still made it their own.
|
|
|
Post by hyperstarre on Jul 18, 2007 19:09:03 GMT -5
I don't think it's that different. Just the vocals are different, but that's just because Jason is a whole different kind of vocalist. that's what i meant i dunno, because of the way he sings it, it has a different feeling, kwim?
|
|
|
Post by gogonutz on Jul 18, 2007 19:11:28 GMT -5
well, it's just that Jason's voice is more soothing, so it sounds sweeter, more romantic, but the way they played it is in the tradition of the original, i think.. but anywho.. it's a great cover
|
|
|
Post by hyperstarre on Jul 18, 2007 19:26:00 GMT -5
well, it's just that Jason's voice is more soothing, so it sounds sweeter, more romantic, but the way they played it is in the tradition of the original, i think.. but anywho.. it's a great cover yeah, probably. i just listened to it again...musically, it's pretty similar!
|
|
|
Post by jolene102 on Jul 19, 2007 17:24:13 GMT -5
2 of my coworkers told me and sent me radio station links to listen online. it's my top priority once i get to work tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by jolene102 on Jul 20, 2007 7:38:36 GMT -5
FINALLY, I am listening. They sound absolutely BEAUTIFUL!!! I mean really BEAUTIFUL!!!
|
|